Dish: CBS made 'Big Bang Theory' star delete Hopper tweet

Kaley Cuoco, star of 'The Big Bang Theory,' tweeted that the Dish Hopper was 'amazing.' The tweet was later deleted.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The latest drama comes after Kaley Cuoco, star of CBS's hit show "The Big Bang Theory," sent a sponsored tweet on Wednesday about the Dish Hopper DVR. Dish (DISH, Fortune 500) had paid her to tweet that the Hopper was "amazing" and "awesome."

CBS (CBS, Fortune 500) and many other broadcasters are currently locked in a legal battle with Dish over Hopper's ad-skipping technology.

Cuoco's tweet has since been deleted, and Dish sent out a press release calling attention to that.

"It's disappointing that CBS -- once the exemplar of editorial independence and innovation -- continues to use its heavy hand to hold back progress from consumers," Dish CEO Joe Clayton said in a statement.

CBS shot back with its own strongly worded denial: "Once again, Joe Clayton demonstrates his dubious gift for hyperbole and hucksterism. No demands were made, but it's clear that Dish's culture of fabrication is alive and well."

A CBS spokesman said separately that the company did not contact Cuoco "at all."

The Cuoco kerfuffle comes a few weeks after CBS-owned tech site CNet put the Hopper on an awards shortlist. CBS stepped in, forcing CNet to remove the Hopper from consideration -- and banning the site from reviewing "products manufactured by companies with which we are in litigation with respect to such product."

Dish is also mired in lawsuits with Comcast's (CMCSA) NBC, News Corp.'s (NWS) Fox, Disney's (DIS, Fortune 500) ABC and other networks over the Hopper, which lets users record up to six channels at once and automatically skip commercials for primetime network shows.

"The Big Bang Theory" is produced by Warner Bros. Television, a subsidiary of CNNMoney parent company Time Warner. (TWX, Fortune 500)

First Published: March 1, 2013: 12:35 PM ET

15.30 | 0 komentar | Read More

State Department sees no environmental red flags on Keystone route

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

If the company behind the pipeline, TransCanada, follows all the rules, its "construction and normal operation" of the pipeline should pose no major risks, the State Department said in its draft environmental impact statement. That statement is now open for a 45-day public comment period. The Obama administration will make its decision about the pipeline later this year, likely in mid-summer.

The project was delayed last year because of concerns about how it would affect Nebraska's sensitive Sand Hills region. The Obama administration -- which needs to approve the project because it crosses an international border -- turned down those plans, forcing TransCanada to draft a new proposed route.

The pipeline has touched off an intense debate in the United States. Supporters like it because it will carry 830,000 barrels a day of oil from Alberta, Canada, to the U.S. Gulf Coast, potentially reducing imports from other, more volatile areas. Its construction will create an estimated 5,000 jobs, according to the State Department. TransCanada forecasts even higher job growth.

Related: America has an energy boom. Now what?

Opponents hate it because oil from Canada's oil sands region produces 5% to 30% more greenhouse gases than other types of conventional crude. Extracting oil from the sands also uses massive amounts of water and can result in deforestation. Transporting it runs the risk of spills.

The State Department report did take into account the environmental impact of the sands' heavy oil, which it said is 17% dirtier than the average barrel of oil used in the United States. However, it also said that not building the pipeline would not significantly limit oil sands development, or U.S. consumption of heavy oil.

If Keystone is not constructed, that oil would be still be extract and used, State believes. It would simply be transported to buyers by rail or other means instead of through the pipeline.

The report was not well-received by environmentalists.

"It's a good thing this is a draft," said Susan Casey-Lefkowitz, international director at the Natural Resources Defense Council. "Certainly the public is going to have a lot to say in response."

First Published: March 1, 2013: 5:28 PM ET

15.30 | 0 komentar | Read More

Obama signs order triggering spending cuts

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Known officially as sequestration, the president's order canceled $85 billion in federal funding over the next seven months.

As required, the White House budget office also sent to Congress a report detailing the magnitude of cuts that federal agencies will have to make.

In aggregate, defense spending must be cut by 13% over the next seven months and nondefense programs must be cut by 9%. Those percentage cuts will apply to all non-exempt programs, projects and activities.

(Related: 4 myths about the cuts)

In dollars, the spending reduction must be split evenly between defense and nondefense -- as a result, each category will lose nearly $43 billion in funding.

Some key areas of spending will be protected from the budget ax -- most notably military personnel, Medicare and Social Security benefits, as well as Medicaid and food stamps.

The funding reductions would come primarily from what's known as discretionary accounts, which make up the smallest part of the overall federal budget, accounting for a little over a third of all spending.

Discretionary spending supports a vast array of federal agencies from the FBI to the FDA to the National Transportation Safety Board, as well as education programs across the country.

The actual dollars cut from these and other areas varies widely since their normal funding levels do as well.

Navy operations and maintenance, for instance, will take a nearly $3.5 billion hit. National Science Foundation research funding will drop $290 million. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will lose $52 million. And the Affordable Housing Program will see its budget cut by $10 million.

Few would dispute Obama's characterization of the cuts. In fact, it's one of the few things about the so-called sequester that Democrats and Republicans agree on. They failed to agree on how to replace them, however.

Both chambers of Congress passed the sequester as part of the deal that put an end to the ugly fight over the debt ceiling in 2011.

(Related: When the cuts will really bite)

The cuts were designed to be so distasteful that they would spur lawmakers to approve a smarter approach to deficit reduction. But they've failed to do so.

The cuts will result in many if not most federal workers furloughed for some period of time. And federal contracts and grants will be curtailed or not renewed. That, in turn, will create delays in services, travel hassles, less border security, fewer food inspections, interrupted medical research and less disposable income that has buoyed local communities.

Such ramifications will deliver a blow to economic growth, but not a fatal one -- a point the president acknowledged Friday.

"Even with these cuts in place, folks all across this country will work hard to make sure that we keep the recovery going. But Washington sure isn't making it easy," Obama said.

(Impact: IRS furloughs to spare tax season)

Congress will get another chance to forge an agreement over replacing the cuts this month, as lawmakers duke it out over spending levels for the rest of this fiscal year. They have until March 27 to approve a new funding bill. If they don't, the government will shut down, with the exception of essential services.

If they succeed in replacing the cuts by then, the disruption caused by the sequester may be limited, since its ramifications will unfold over several months as opposed to a few weeks.

First Published: March 1, 2013: 8:50 PM ET

15.30 | 0 komentar | Read More

High hopes for Japan's central banker

Masaaki Shirakawa is stepping down as Bank of Japan governor.

HONG KONG (CNNMoney)

Elected prime minister for a second time in December, Abe has argued forcefully that the central bank is not moving quickly enough to stimulate Japan's flagging economy. He favors aggressive monetary easing, and made that the centerpiece of his election campaign.

The idea is that further easing, combined with fiscal stimulus, could end years of deflation and coax the world's third largest economy out of recession.

The strategy got a boost Thursday as Abe nominated Haruhiko Kuroda to succeed Masaaki Shirakawa as Japan's top central banker.

Kuroda has deep ties within the international finance community. He has been a vocal critic of the central bank's timidity, and his policy prescriptions largely mirror those of Abe.

Even without much concrete action thus far by the central bank, markets have responded strongly in the hope that words will be turned into deeds under the new leadership.

The yen has weakened significantly, falling 20% against the U.S. dollar since the beginning of October. The Nikkei has been on a tear, adding more than 30% since the middle of November.

But what more can the Bank of Japan and its new governor do? And will markets be satisfied?

Interest rates, a central bank's main tool, are already very low. And Shirakawa has already set a new inflation target of 2%.

"A closer look at Kuroda's policy options suggests that the markets' expectations of much more aggressive easing are likely to be disappointed," Julian Jessop at Capital Economics wrote in a research note.

Related: Don't fight the BoJ

Kuroda favors setting a deadline to achieve the inflation target, perhaps within two years. It's a policy that markets will cheer in the short term, but the impact may pale compared with the setting of the higher 2% target in the first place.

Kuroda could also push the bank towards expanding its asset purchase program. It's already buying short-term debt, and could expand its balance sheet by buying more exotic assets or foreign currency bonds.

But those strategies might have a limited impact as the central bank has already increased its bond-buying program several times, while both Kuroda and Abe have balked at the prospect of buying foreign currency bonds - a move which would almost certainly bring renewed accusations that Japan is triggering a currency war.

"We think the most likely changes under Kuroda would be a further increase in [Japanese government bond] purchases and a lengthening of their maturity," Jessop wrote. "This may not be much different from what Shirakawa would have done and would still fall well short of the easing currently planned in the U.S."

Related: Japan's economy contracts for third straight quarter

Some analysts fear that investors are bound to feel like the bank's actions aren't living up to Abe's rhetoric.

'Some of the more radical options, including purchases of foreign bonds and a two-year horizon for the inflation target, are unlikely to gain sufficient support, all of which is setting up the markets for some major disappointment," Jessop said.

Others argue Japan has to try something.

"From a global point of view, is it good for the Japanese economy to continue to suffer from deflation ... and low growth?" Kuroda asked during an interview with the Wall Street Journal earlier this month. "That is not good for Japan, not good for the world economy."

First Published: February 28, 2013: 7:43 PM ET

17.42 | 0 komentar | Read More

Time to call a truce in the currency wars

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Yes, the yen has weakened and the pound has gotten pounded, but worries about an all-out currency war may be overblown.

There's a perception that some countries' economies are being harmed by currency movements that have been undertaken to gain an unfair advantage.

That may be a bit misguided.

In the United States, the threat of a fiscal contraction due to sequestration has prompted the Federal Reserve to take actions that could weaken the dollar.

Signals suggest that the new head of the central bank in Japan will pursue a more expansionary policy in an effort to stimulate that country's long-moribund economy.

These actions are taken for purely domestic reasons, but they could have consequences for currencies.

In anticipation of frictions that could arise, there was an agreement by the G-20 nations at the recent Moscow summit to refrain from so-called competitive devaluations.

Related: G20 pledge: No currency war

But, since then, governments such as South Korea and New Zealand have signaled a desire to pursue explicit policies to weaken currencies, or even to impose capital controls.

As was the case with Brazil a few years ago, the current concerns and frustrations of countries like South Korea and New Zealand are understandable.

Competitive devaluations have a checkered history, and efforts to impose capital controls to stem appreciations have little chance of success.

'Currency wars' was coined by Brazilian finance minister Guido Matega two years ago, when the real appreciated by 10% against the U.S. dollar within a four-month period.

That strength was threatening the Brazilian export sector and, more broadly, the growth of the Brazilian economy.

But it's hard to make the case that the strength of the real was a direct consequence of hostile intent by the Federal Reserve to cheapen the dollar and gain an advantage.

The Fed did undertake an aggressive program to rescue the American economy, and the dollar did depreciate against the real, but at the same time the dollar appreciated against other major currencies.

Probably the most important factor behind the real appreciation was the relative strength of the Brazilian economy at a time when advanced economies were in the throes of the Great Recession.

International capital flowed to Brazil in response to its relative robustness, and also because long-standing capital controls in other countries, notably China, prevented capital from flowing there.

Later, as the Brazilian economy cooled, the real depreciated by 35% during the second half of 2012, even though the Federal Reserve stepped up its aggressive monetary policy.

Nevertheless, Matega's frustration at the time of the real appreciation was understandable.

Brazilian policy choices were limited. A monetary expansion might weaken its currency, but it would also have likely led to inflation that would have offset any currency depreciation. The authorities turned to capital controls.

But these episodic controls, unlike the long-standing ones in China, did little to stem the appreciation of the currency.

While there are few easy solutions these days, an appropriate response would include stimulus from countries with the fiscal space to undertake these types of policies. And that's how currency war fears can be defused.

First Published: March 1, 2013: 3:30 AM ET

17.42 | 0 komentar | Read More

Stocks: Spending cuts keep mood cautious

U.S. stocks fell Thursday.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Assuming no last minute deal, $85 billion in automatic spending cuts are due to begin Friday although it may be weeks or months before the pain is felt. Still, markets are likely to remain in cautious mood as major indices hover just below record highs.

U.S. stock futures were flat before the opening bell.

At 8:30 a.m. ET, the Commerce Department will release data on personal income and spending, while at 10, the Census Bureau publishes data on construction spending.

Also at 10, the Institute for Supply Management will release its monthly manufacturing report, and the University of Michigan and Thomson Reuters will publish the final edition of their consumer sentiment index for February.

In corporate news, Best Buy (BBY, Fortune 500) is scheduled to announce quarterly results before the opening bell.

Fear & Greed Index

U.S. stocks ended in the red Thursday, with the Dow stalling just below its all-time high.

Groupon (GRPN) shares rose in after-hours trading Thursday after the daily deals site announced that embattled CEO Andrew Mason would be replaced.

Gap (GPS, Fortune 500) shares rose after hours following fourth-quarter earnings from the apparel maker that beat expectations.

Shares of Salesforce.com (CRM) also rose following strong earnings announced after the bell.

European markets were steady in morning trading, while Asian markets ended mixed.

First Published: March 1, 2013: 4:56 AM ET

17.42 | 0 komentar | Read More

Flowers Foods buys Wonder Bread from Hostess

Wonder Bread could be returning to stores.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

A $360 million bid by baker Flowers Foods (FLO) for Wonder and most other Hostess bread brands has been accepted, Flowers announced Thursday.

The deal still needs to be approved in bankruptcy court next month, and Flowers CEO George Deese said it may be several months before the deal is approved by regulators and finalized.

Hostess did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Wonder Bread, Twinkies and other Hostess products have not been produced since November, when the company filed with the bankruptcy court to liquidate its business following a crippling strike by the Bakery Workers union.

But while Hostess is out of business, and most of its 18,500 employees have lost their jobs, the company has been auctioning off its various brands as part of the liquidation process.

Flowers was designated as the leading bidder for Hostess' bread business on Jan. 11. Besides Wonder, the deal includes Nature's Pride, Merita, Home Pride and Butternut bread brands, as well as 20 bakeries.

"We are pleased Flowers won the bid for Hostess' primary bread brands and bakeries without the need for an auction," Deese said in a statement, adding that Flowers has "proven experience in integrating acquisitions."

On Jan. 30, a joint $410 million bid by Apollo Global Management (APO) and Metropoulos & Co. was similarly tapped as the leading bidder for the iconic Twinkies brand, the Dolly Madison line of snacks, as well as five bakeries and some of the equipment.

Also in January, McKee Foods Corp. was tapped as the leading bidder with its $27.5 million offer for Hostess' Drake's brand and some of its equipment. Drake's products include Ring Dings, Yodels, Devil Dogs and Yankee Doodles, as well as its coffee cake.

A final decision on those two bids is still pending.

Anthony Michael Sabino, a business professor at St. John's University, said Flowers' bid for Wonder Bread was high enough to chase away interest from other potential bidders. The other products have apparently drawn more interest, meaning there will likely be auctions to determine the final purchaser, which could delay those products' return. Still, Sabino thinks Twinkies could be back on shelves by the time school starts in the fall.

"And not a moment too soon, with Americans hungering for a comfort food they never believed they would have to do without," he said.

Related: Last batch of Twinkies reaches the store shelves

Each of the bidders already has a track record selling baked goods and other food products.

Flowers owns the Nature's Own and Tastykake brands of products.

Metropoulos has experience turning around financially troubled food brands. The firm's food holdings include Pabst Blue Ribbon beer, and in the past have included Chef Boyardee canned pasta, Bumble Bee seafood, PAM cooking spray and Gulden's Mustard, all of which it eventually sold to ConAgra Foods Inc (CAG, Fortune 500).

McKee, a privately held company, is best known for its Little Debbie brand of snacks.

CNNMoney's James O'Toole contributed reporting.

First Published: February 28, 2013: 5:10 PM ET

15.30 | 0 komentar | Read More

Groupon CEO Andrew Mason's severance: $378.36

Andrew Mason is scoring a token sum in his severance package.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Mason, Groupon's 32-year-old co-founder, announced his departure on Thursday in typically blunt fashion: "I was fired today," he wrote in a staff memo that he released publicly. Groupon's (GRPN) IPO filing details his employment agreement, which calls for Groupon to keep paying his salary for six months after he leaves the company. (His health care and other benefits also continue for 180 days.)

Because Mason was making only $756.72 per year, that doesn't amount to much.

It's become common for tech executives who run companies they founded -- including Facebook's (FB) Mark Zuckerberg and Google's (GOOG, Fortune 500) Larry Page -- to take a $1 cash salary, since they already have a fortune in company stock.

Mason made a $180,000 base salary in 2010, but regulatory documents show that he asked the board to slash his salary in 2011, the most recent year for which his salary information is available. (It's unclear why the famously quirky Mason chose the strangely precise figure of $756.72.)

He won't be leaving as a pauper, though. Mason holds nearly 47 million shares of Groupon, worth about $213 million at Thursday's closing price.

Mason cashed out Groupon shares twice before the company's IPO, netting around $28 million, but hasn't sold any of his stake since the company went public in November 2011.

He fellow co-founder, Groupon executive chairman Eric Lefkofsky -- who provided the company's start-up cash and got the biggest chunk of its equity -- dwarfs Mason in the stock-sale game. Lefkosky made $382 million selling off Groupon shares before the company went public, at prices as high as $15.79 per share.

Groupon went public at $20 per share, but its value plunged rapidly. Shares ended trading Thursday at $4.53.

First Published: February 28, 2013: 7:09 PM ET

15.30 | 0 komentar | Read More

High hopes for Japan's central banker

Masaaki Shirakawa is stepping down as Bank of Japan governor.

HONG KONG (CNNMoney)

Elected prime minister for a second time in December, Abe has argued forcefully that the central bank is not moving quickly enough to stimulate Japan's flagging economy. He favors aggressive monetary easing, and made that the centerpiece of his election campaign.

The idea is that further easing, combined with fiscal stimulus, could end years of deflation and coax the world's third largest economy out of recession.

The strategy got a boost Thursday as Abe nominated Haruhiko Kuroda to succeed Masaaki Shirakawa as Japan's top central banker.

Kuroda has deep ties within the international finance community. He has been a vocal critic of the central bank's timidity, and his policy prescriptions largely mirror those of Abe.

Even without much concrete action thus far by the central bank, markets have responded strongly in the hope that words will be turned into deeds under the new leadership.

The yen has weakened significantly, falling 20% against the U.S. dollar since the beginning of October. The Nikkei has been on a tear, adding more than 30% since the middle of November.

But what more can the Bank of Japan and its new governor do? And will markets be satisfied?

Interest rates, a central bank's main tool, are already very low. And Shirakawa has already set a new inflation target of 2%.

"A closer look at Kuroda's policy options suggests that the markets' expectations of much more aggressive easing are likely to be disappointed," Julian Jessop at Capital Economics wrote in a research note.

Related: Don't fight the BoJ

Kuroda favors setting a deadline to achieve the inflation target, perhaps within two years. It's a policy that markets will cheer in the short term, but the impact may pale compared with the setting of the higher 2% target in the first place.

Kuroda could also push the bank towards expanding its asset purchase program. It's already buying short-term debt, and could expand its balance sheet by buying more exotic assets or foreign currency bonds.

But those strategies might have a limited impact as the central bank has already increased its bond-buying program several times, while both Kuroda and Abe have balked at the prospect of buying foreign currency bonds - a move which would almost certainly bring renewed accusations that Japan is triggering a currency war.

"We think the most likely changes under Kuroda would be a further increase in [Japanese government bond] purchases and a lengthening of their maturity," Jessop wrote. "This may not be much different from what Shirakawa would have done and would still fall well short of the easing currently planned in the U.S."

Related: Japan's economy contracts for third straight quarter

Some analysts fear that investors are bound to feel like the bank's actions aren't living up to Abe's rhetoric.

'Some of the more radical options, including purchases of foreign bonds and a two-year horizon for the inflation target, are unlikely to gain sufficient support, all of which is setting up the markets for some major disappointment," Jessop said.

Others argue Japan has to try something.

"From a global point of view, is it good for the Japanese economy to continue to suffer from deflation ... and low growth?" Kuroda asked during an interview with the Wall Street Journal earlier this month. "That is not good for Japan, not good for the world economy."

First Published: February 28, 2013: 7:43 PM ET

15.30 | 0 komentar | Read More

Struggling homeowners turned to short sales in 2012

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

There were nearly three times as many short sales as there were sales of foreclosed homes in 2012, according to RealtyTrac. Foreclosures accounted for 11% of all sales, down from 13% a year before. Meanwhile, short sales rose 5% year-over-year, accounting for 32% of all home deals.

"We're seeing fewer of the most disruptive sales, the [bank-owned foreclosures], hitting the market but there are still a lot of distressed property sales," said Daren Blomquist, spokesman for RealtyTrac. "They're shifting to short sales, though."

In a short sale, homeowners sell at a price that is less than what they owe the bank, and the bank agrees to absorb the loss. Typically, a seller has to demonstrate some kind of financial hardship before the bank will approve the deal -- and forgive the unpaid debt. The bank then sells the house, typically at a better price than it would have gotten had the home gone into foreclosure.

During the fourth quarter, the average discount on a foreclosure was a whopping 39%, while the average short sale sold for 23% below market, RealtyTrac found.

Related: Million-dollar foreclosures

The biggest spike in short sales last year occurred during the second half of the year. Fueling the increase was the National Mortgage Settlement, an agreement between the government and the nation's five biggest mortgage lenders which was finalized last February.

Under the terms of the deal, the banks receive credit towards the settlement when they approve short sales for distressed homeowners. Of the $45 billion in consumer relief that lenders have reported under that agreement, $19 billion has gone toward forgiving debt in short sales, according to the latest report from the Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight.

Related: 10 great foreclosure deals

Many underwater homeowners were also scrambling to unload their properties before the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act was set to expire December 31. Had the act been allowed to lapse, homeowners would have had to start paying income taxes on the portion of their mortgage that is forgiven in a foreclosure, short sale or principal reduction.

The growing number of short sales helped buoy the housing market and push distressed home prices higher last year. During the fourth quarter, for example, homes that were either bank-owned or in foreclosure sold for an average of $171,704, an increase of 4% from a year earlier.

Related: Foreclosures -- hardest hit neighborhoods'

In Arizona, prices were 22% higher in the fourth quarter compared with late 2011. In Nevada, prices jumped 21%; and in California -- where short sales comprised more than a third of all sales -- they increased 14%, RealtyTrac reported.

First Published: February 28, 2013: 12:45 AM ET

17.42 | 0 komentar | Read More